My personal art epiphany occurred in two parts. First, in a 1993 conversation with artist George Herms, he told me “The only sin in art is glamour and the only truth I know is ‘The Rose’.” It sounded a little too poetic. George is the original hippie, but he is the antithesis of hippy-dippy, so I scratched the surface at what he meant.
“The Rose” to which he was referring was the legendary painting by Jay DeFeo.
The toughest thing to stomach in the art world is when some allegedly “important” work of art turns out to be a withering piece of shit.
Each of us has, at times, been lied to about greatness by a textbook, a biased art historian, a big name critic, a trendy theory or a greedy gallerist “certain” of “where art is going!”
They never mention that Rauschenberg’s stupid goat is less than two feet off the ground, nor that Matthew Barney’s movies are pain-inducing tedium. Does Damien Hirst seem nothing but a clever designer label? Are you bored stiff by Judy Chicago’s Dinner Party? Ever felt Jasper Johns was not on Target? Certain that Mike Kelley’s infatuation with arrested development is actually a case of arrested development? Understand that Chris Burden is surpassed and nullified a hundred times daily on YouTube? Wonder if Pol Pot would applaud Baldessari’s dots over peoples’ faces? When the cognoscenti are braying that an artist is “influential” it is a weather vane named fame pointing toward either lame or tame. |